I'm all in favor of allowing marriage among Catholics. I think an injustice and a mistake to try to stop them.
Catholicism is not a disease. Catholics, though many do not like them or they seem strange, they are normal people and must have the same rights as others, like, for example, computer or homosexual.
I am aware that many behaviors and character traits of the Catholic people, as almost unhealthy attitude towards sex may seem strange to others. I know that even, sometimes, one might say public health arguments, as the dangerous and deliberate rejection of condoms. I also know that many of their customs, as the public display of images of torture, may bother some. But this, besides being a media image than reality, is no reason to prevent the exercise of the marriage.
Some might argue that a Catholic marriage is not a real marriage, because for them it is a ritual and religious law to their god, rather than a union between two people. Also, since children outside of marriage are severely condemned by the Church, some might consider that allowing Catholics to marry will increase the number of marriages by "what people will say" or the simple pursuit of sex (forbidden by their religion outside of marriage) thereby increasing domestic violence and broken families. But remember that this is not something that happens only in Catholic families and, since we can not get into the head of others, we should not judge their motives.
On the other hand, to say that this is not marriage and should be called otherwise is merely a somewhat mean to divert the debate semantic issues are beside the point: even among Catholics, marriage is a marriage and a family is a family.
And with this allusion to the family passed another hot topic on which my opinion, I hope, not too radical, too, am in favor of allowing Catholics to adopt children.
Some are appalled by a statement of this kind. It is likely that some respond with exclamations such as "Catholic" adopting children? These children may be Catholics! ".
I see that kind of criticism and respond, if it is true that the children of Catholics have become much more likely to turn into Catholics (Unlike, for example, occurs in computing or homosexuality), I have argued before that Catholics are people like everyone else.
Despite the views of some and the evidence, there is evidence that some Catholic parents are least equipped to educate a child, or that the religious atmosphere of a Catholic home bias is a negative influence for the child. In addition, courts in adoption judge each case individually, and it is their work to determine the suitability of the parents.
In short, despite the views of some sectors, I think they should be allowed also to Catholics both marriage and adoption.
Just like the computer and homosexuals.
This support for marriage between Catholics circulating on the Internet and win accessions are counted in hundreds.
Catholicism is not a disease. Catholics, though many do not like them or they seem strange, they are normal people and must have the same rights as others, like, for example, computer or homosexual.
I am aware that many behaviors and character traits of the Catholic people, as almost unhealthy attitude towards sex may seem strange to others. I know that even, sometimes, one might say public health arguments, as the dangerous and deliberate rejection of condoms. I also know that many of their customs, as the public display of images of torture, may bother some. But this, besides being a media image than reality, is no reason to prevent the exercise of the marriage.
Some might argue that a Catholic marriage is not a real marriage, because for them it is a ritual and religious law to their god, rather than a union between two people. Also, since children outside of marriage are severely condemned by the Church, some might consider that allowing Catholics to marry will increase the number of marriages by "what people will say" or the simple pursuit of sex (forbidden by their religion outside of marriage) thereby increasing domestic violence and broken families. But remember that this is not something that happens only in Catholic families and, since we can not get into the head of others, we should not judge their motives.
On the other hand, to say that this is not marriage and should be called otherwise is merely a somewhat mean to divert the debate semantic issues are beside the point: even among Catholics, marriage is a marriage and a family is a family.
And with this allusion to the family passed another hot topic on which my opinion, I hope, not too radical, too, am in favor of allowing Catholics to adopt children.
Some are appalled by a statement of this kind. It is likely that some respond with exclamations such as "Catholic" adopting children? These children may be Catholics! ".
I see that kind of criticism and respond, if it is true that the children of Catholics have become much more likely to turn into Catholics (Unlike, for example, occurs in computing or homosexuality), I have argued before that Catholics are people like everyone else.
Despite the views of some and the evidence, there is evidence that some Catholic parents are least equipped to educate a child, or that the religious atmosphere of a Catholic home bias is a negative influence for the child. In addition, courts in adoption judge each case individually, and it is their work to determine the suitability of the parents.
In short, despite the views of some sectors, I think they should be allowed also to Catholics both marriage and adoption.
Just like the computer and homosexuals.
This support for marriage between Catholics circulating on the Internet and win accessions are counted in hundreds.
0 comments:
Post a Comment